Trial

  Lawyers California.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
January 30, 2012
Trial-Lawyer
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Trial News

 

United States Published In The Federal Register A Revised Proposed Final Judgment

As required under the Tunney Act, on November 28, 2001, the United States published in the Federal Register a Revised Proposed Final Judgment, a Competitive Impact Statement, and detailed procedures for the submission of public comments regarding the United States' proposed settlement with Microsoft. The 60-day public comment period lasted from November 28, 2001 through January 28, 2002. During that period, the United States received 32,392 comments from the public. Of these comments, the United States categorized 47 of these comments as "major." The United States provided the "major" comments to the Court on February 14, 2002, and subsequently published these comments on the Antitrust Division website.

On March 1, 2002, the United States made the full text of the public comments available for downloading and viewing on the Antitrust Division's website by implementing the procedure detailed in the United States' Motion for Leave of Court to Adopt an Alternative Procedure for Comment Publication . On May 3, 2002, the full text of the public comments was also published in the Federal Register.

Since November 21, 2004, the United States has received inquiries from six citizens requesting that some portion of the comments that they had submitted during the Tunney Act comment period be removed from the Antitrust Division's website. Generally, these citizens have requested that their personal information be removed from the Internet due to privacy concerns. None of these requests were related to the "major" comments.

Given that citizens have started to request removal of their comments and that the full text of the public comments will continue to be available to the public through the Federal Register and upon request from the United States, the United States believes it would be appropriate to remove these non-major comments from the Antitrust Division's website. The comments will still be widely available to the public and this will permit the United States to respond to what appear to be reasonable privacy concerns.

Therefore, subject to the Court's concurrence, the United States plans to remove all of the public comments not categorized as "major" from the Antitrust Division's website.

Contact our California Trial Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
 


  News Room  
 


Latest news about Lawyers California.com cases in California and nationwide:

Trial Court Completes Rollout Of Masscourts Lite
Chief Justice for Administration and Management Robert A. Mulligan today announced that the Trial Court has completed its rollout of MassCOURTS Lit...
Read more >


New Queens Supreme Court Initiative Connects Self-Represented Litigants With Community Lawyers
With the opening of the Self-Represented Legal Assistance Project at Queens Supreme Court, low-income litigants navigating the legal system without...
Read more >


Attorneys' Opening Statements
The lawyer for the plaintiff in a civil case or the prosecutor in a criminal case may make an opening statement telling you what they expect the ev...
Read more >


More Trial News >

 
 

Trial Terms

 


Today's Terms

Arraignment

Definition:
The court proceeding during which a person is informed of the charges against him or her.

Bail

Definition:
An amount of money determined by the judge and posted with the court as security to ensure the defendants appearance in court at a specific time.

Exhibits

Definition:
Physical evidence introduced at a hearing or trial.

More Trial Terms >

 

Search Site:

 
 

Trial Law Resources

 


Search Trial resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Trial Law Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Trial:

  • Criminal Procedure 
  • Civil Procedure 
  • Appellate Procedure 
  • Legal Ethics
  • Civil Trials

More Trial Topics >

California Trial-Lawyer Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Trial-Lawyer attorney you should contact our Trial-Lawyer Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Antioch
  • Bell
  • Hawthorne
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Pacoima
  • Santa Ana
  • South Gate
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Oxnard
  • Pacoima
  • Pittsburg
  • Santa Ana
  • South Gate
  • Sylmar
  • Watsonville
  • Westminster
  • Fremont
  • Fresno
  • Hawthorne
  • Hayward
  • Hesperia
  • Huntington Beach
  • Huntington Park
  • Indio
  • La Habra
  • La Puente
  • Laguna Niguel
  • Lake Forest
  • Lancaster
  • Livermore
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Lynwood
  • Merced
  • Milpitas
  • Montebello
  • Moreno Valley
  • Napa
  • North Hollywood
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Ontario
  • Oxnard
  • Pacoima
  • Palmdale
  • Panorama City
  • Pico Rivera
  • Pittsburg
  • Pomona
  • Porterville
  • Reseda
  • Rialto
  • Riverside
  • Rosemead
  • Sacramento
  • Salinas
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
  • San Pedro
  • Santa Ana
  • Simi Valley
  • South Gate
  • South San Francisco
  • Sylmar
  • Tulare
  • Union City
  • Vacaville
  • Victorville
  • Vista
  • Watsonville
  • Westminster
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Trial Lawyers California.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.